Menu
If you are remain an optimistic mind all the time when you are preparing for the PSE-Strata-Pro-24 exam, we deeply believe that it will be very easy for you to successfully pass the PSE-Strata-Pro-24 exam, and get the related PSE-Strata-Pro-24 certification in the near future. Of course, we also know that how to keep an optimistic mind is a question that is very difficult for a lot of people to answer. As is known to us, where there is a will, there is a way. We believe you will get wonderful results with the help of our PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Exam Questions as we have been professional in this field.
If you are busing with your work or study, and have little time for preparation of your exam, our PSE-Strata-Pro-24 questions and answers will be your best choice. With experienced experts to compile and verify, PSE-Strata-Pro-24 exam dumps contain most of the knowledge points for the exam, and you just need to spend about 48 to 72 hours on study, you can pass the exam just one time. In addition, you can try free demo before buying PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Materials, so that you can have a better understanding of what you are going to buy. You can get downloading link and password within ten minutes after payment, so that you can start your learning right away.
>> PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Valid Test Camp <<
Remember that this is a crucial part of your career, and you must keep pace with the changing time to achieve something substantial in terms of a certification or a degree. So do avail yourself of this chance to get help from our exceptional Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewall (PSE-Strata-Pro-24) dumps to grab the most competitive Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 certificate. TestPassKing has formulated the Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewall (PSE-Strata-Pro-24) product in three versions. You will find their specifications below to understand them better.
NEW QUESTION # 26
Which three use cases are specific to Policy Optimizer? (Choose three.)
Answer: A,D,E
Explanation:
The question asks for three use cases specific to Policy Optimizer, a feature in PAN-OS designed to enhance security policy management on Palo Alto Networks Strata Hardware Firewalls. Policy Optimizer helps administrators refine firewall rules by leveraging App-ID technology, transitioning from legacy port-based policies to application-based policies, and optimizing rule efficiency. Below is a detailed explanation of why options A, C, and E are the correct use cases, verified against official Palo Alto Networks documentation.
Step 1: Understanding Policy Optimizer in PAN-OS
Policy Optimizer is a tool introduced in PAN-OS 9.0 and enhanced in subsequent versions (e.g., 11.1), accessible under Policies > Policy Optimizer in the web interface. It analyzes traffic logs to:
* Identify applications traversing the network.
* Suggest refinements to security rules (e.g., replacing ports with App-IDs).
* Provide insights into rule usage and optimization opportunities.
Its primary goal is to align policies with Palo Alto Networks' application-centric approach, improving security and manageability on Strata NGFWs.
NEW QUESTION # 27
A customer claims that Advanced WildFire miscategorized a file as malicious and wants proof, because another vendor has said that the file is benign.
How could the systems engineer assure the customer that Advanced WildFire was accurate?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Advanced WildFire is Palo Alto Networks' cloud-based malware analysis and prevention solution. It determines whether files are malicious by executing them in a sandbox environment and observing their behavior. To address the customer's concern about the file categorization, the systems engineer must provide evidence of the file's behavior. Here's the analysis of each option:
* Option A: Review the threat logs for information to provide to the customer
* Threat logs can provide a summary of events and verdicts for malicious files, but they do not include the detailed behavior analysis needed to convince the customer.
* While reviewing the logs is helpful as a preliminary step, it does not provide the level of proof the customer needs.
* This option is not sufficient on its own.
* Option B: Use the WildFire Analysis Report in the log to show the customer the malicious actions the file took when it was detonated
* WildFire generates an analysis report that includes details about the file's behavior during detonation in the sandbox, such as network activity, file modifications, process executions, and any indicators of compromise (IoCs).
* This report provides concrete evidence to demonstrate why the file was flagged as malicious. It is the most accurate way to assure the customer that WildFire's decision was based on observed malicious actions.
* This is the best option.
* Option C: Open a TAG ticket for the customer and allow support engineers to determine the appropriate action
* While opening a support ticket is a valid action for further analysis or appeal, it isnot a direct way to assure the customer of the current WildFire verdict.
* This option does not directly address the customer's request for immediate proof.
* This option is not ideal.
* Option D: Do nothing because the customer will realize Advanced WildFire is right
* This approach is dismissive of the customer's concerns and does not provide any evidence to support WildFire's decision.
* This option is inappropriate.
References:
* Palo Alto Networks documentation on WildFire
* WildFire Analysis Reports
NEW QUESTION # 28
A prospective customer has provided specific requirements for an upcoming firewall purchase, including the need to process a minimum of 200,000 connections per second while maintaining at least 15 Gbps of throughput with App-ID and Threat Prevention enabled.
What should a systems engineer do to determine the most suitable firewall for the customer?
Answer: B
Explanation:
The prospective customer has provided precise performance requirements for their firewall purchase, and the systems engineer must recommend a suitable Palo Alto Networks Strata Hardware Firewall (e.
g., PA-Series) model. The requirements include a minimum of 200,000 connections per second (CPS) and 15 Gbps of throughput with App-ID and Threat Prevention enabled. Let's evaluate the best approach to meet these needs.
Step 1: Understand the Requirements
* Connections per Second (CPS): 200,000 new sessions per second, indicating the firewall's ability to handle high transaction rates (e.g., web traffic, API calls).
* Throughput with App-ID and Threat Prevention: 15 Gbps, measured with application identification and threat prevention features active, reflecting real-world NGFW performance.
* Goal: Identify a PA-Series model that meets or exceeds these specs while considering the customer's actual traffic profile for optimal sizing.
NEW QUESTION # 29
What is the minimum configuration to stop a Cobalt Strike Malleable C2 attack inline and in real time?
Answer: D
Explanation:
Cobalt Strike is a popular post-exploitation framework often used by attackers for Command and Control (C2) operations. Malleable C2 profiles allow attackers to modify the behavior of their C2 communication, making detection more difficult. Stopping these attacks inreal timerequires deep inline inspection and the ability to block zero-day and evasive threats.
* Why "Advanced Threat Prevention and PAN-OS 10.2" (Correct Answer B)?Advanced Threat Prevention (ATP) on PAN-OS 10.2 usesinline deep learning modelsto detect and blockCobalt Strike Malleable C2 attacksin real time. ATP is designed to prevent evasive techniques and zero-day threats, which is essential for blocking Malleable C2. PAN-OS 10.2 introduces enhanced capabilities for detecting malicious traffic patterns and inline analysis of encrypted traffic.
* ATP examines traffic behavior and signature-less threats, effectively stopping evasive C2 profiles.
* PAN-OS 10.2 includes real-time protections specifically for Malleable C2.
* Why not "Next-Generation CASB on PAN-OS 10.1" (Option A)?Next-Generation CASB (Cloud Access Security Broker) is designed to secure SaaS applications and does not provide the inline C2 protection required to stop Malleable C2 attacks. CASB is not related to Command and Control detection.
* Why not "Threat Prevention and Advanced WildFire with PAN-OS 10.0" (Option C)?Threat Prevention and Advanced WildFire are effective for detecting and preventing malware and known threats. However, they rely heavily on signatures and sandboxing for analysis, which is not sufficient for stoppingreal-time evasive C2 traffic. PAN-OS 10.0 lacks the advanced inline capabilities provided by ATP in PAN-OS 10.2.
* Why not "DNS Security, Threat Prevention, and Advanced WildFire with PAN-OS 9.x" (Option D)?While DNS Security and Threat Prevention are valuable for blocking malicious domains and known threats, PAN-OS 9.x does not provide the inline deep learning capabilities needed for real-time detection and prevention of Malleable C2 attacks. The absence of advanced behavioral analysis in PAN- OS 9.x makes this combination ineffective against advanced C2 attacks.
NEW QUESTION # 30
A prospective customer is interested in Palo Alto Networks NGFWs and wants to evaluate the ability to segregate its internal network into unique BGP environments.
Which statement describes the ability of NGFWs to address this need?
Answer: D
Explanation:
Step 1: Understand the Requirement and Context
* Customer Need: Segregate the internal network into unique BGP environments, suggesting multiple isolated or semi-isolated routing domains within a single organization.
* BGP Basics:
* BGP is a routing protocol used to exchange routing information between autonomous systems (ASes).
* eBGP: External BGP, used between different ASes.
* iBGP: Internal BGP, used within a single AS, typically requiring a full mesh of peers unless mitigated by techniques like confederations or route reflectors.
* Palo Alto NGFW: Supports BGP on virtual routers (VRs) within PAN-OS, enabling advanced routing capabilities for Strata hardware firewalls (e.g., PA-Series).
* References: "PAN-OS supports BGP for dynamic routing and network segmentation" (docs.
paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-2/pan-os-networking-admin/bgp).
Step 2: Evaluate Each Option
Option A: It cannot be addressed because PAN-OS does not support it
* Analysis:
* PAN-OS fully supports BGP, including eBGP, iBGP, confederations, and route reflectors, configurable under "Network > Virtual Routers > BGP."
* Features like multiple virtual routers and BGP allow network segregation and routing policy control.
* This statement contradicts documented capabilities.
* Verification:
* "Configure BGP on a virtual router for dynamic routing" (docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-2
/pan-os-networking-admin/bgp/configure-bgp).
* Conclusion: Incorrect-PAN-OS supports BGP and segregation techniques.Not Applicable.
Option B: It can be addressed by creating multiple eBGP autonomous systems
* Analysis:
* eBGP: Used between distinct ASes, each with a unique AS number (e.g., AS 65001, AS 65002).
* Within a single organization, creating multiple eBGP ASes would require:
* Assigning unique AS numbers (public or private) to each internal segment.
* Treating each segment as a separate AS, peering externally with other segments via eBGP.
* Challenges:
* Internally, this isn't practical for a single network-it's more suited to external peering (e.
g., with ISPs).
* Requires complex management and public/private AS number allocation, not ideal for internal segregation.
* Doesn't leverage iBGP or confederations, which are designed for internal AS management.
* PAN-OS supports eBGP, but this approach misaligns with the intent of internal network segregation.
* Verification:
* "eBGP peers connect different ASes" (docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-2/pan-os- networking-admin/bgp/bgp-concepts).
* Conclusion: Possible but impractical and not the intended BGP solution for internal segregation.Not Optimal.
Option C: It can be addressed with BGP confederations
* Description: BGP confederations divide a single AS into sub-ASes (each with a private Confederation Member AS number), reducing the iBGP full-mesh requirement while maintaining a unified external AS.
* Analysis:
* How It Works:
* Single AS (e.g., AS 65000) is split into sub-ASes (e.g., 65001, 65002).
* Within each sub-AS, iBGP full mesh or route reflectors are used.
* Between sub-ASes, eBGP-like peering (confederation EBGP) connects them, but externally, it appears as one AS.
* Segregation:
* Each sub-AS can represent a unique BGP environment (e.g., department, site) with its own routing policies.
* Firewalls within a sub-AS peer via iBGP; across sub-ASes, they use confederation EBGP.
* PAN-OS Support:
* Configurable under "Network > Virtual Routers > BGP > Confederation" with a Confederation Member AS number.
* Ideal for large internal networks needing segmentation without multiple public AS numbers.
* Benefits:
* Simplifies internal BGP management.
* Aligns with the customer's need for unique internal BGP environments.
* Verification:
* "BGP confederations reduce full-mesh burden by dividing an AS into sub-ASes" (docs.
paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-2/pan-os-networking-admin/bgp/bgp-confederations).
* "Supports unique internal routing domains" (knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com).
* Conclusion: Directly addresses the requirement with a supported, practical solution.Applicable.
Option D: It cannot be addressed because BGP must be fully meshed internally to work
* Analysis:
* iBGP Full Mesh: Traditional iBGP requires all routers in an AS to peer with each other, scaling poorly (n(n-1)/2 connections).
* Mitigation: PAN-OS supports alternatives:
* Route Reflectors: Centralize iBGP peering.
* Confederations: Divide the AS into sub-ASes (see Option C).
* This statement ignores these features, falsely claiming BGP's limitation prevents segregation.
* Verification:
* "Confederations and route reflectors eliminate full-mesh needs" (docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan- os/10-2/pan-os-networking-admin/bgp/bgp-confederations).
* Conclusion: Incorrect-PAN-OS overcomes full-mesh constraints.Not Applicable.
Step 3: Recommendation Justification
* Why Option C?
* Alignment: Confederations allow the internal network to be segregated into unique BGP environments (sub-ASes) while maintaining a single external AS, perfectly matching the customer's need.
* Scalability: Reduces iBGP full-mesh complexity, ideal for large or segmented internal networks.
* PAN-OS Support: Explicitly implemented in BGP configuration, validated by documentation.
* Why Not Others?
* A: False-PAN-OS supports BGP and segregation.
* B: eBGP is for external ASes, not internal segregation; less practical thanconfederations.
* D: Misrepresents BGP capabilities; full mesh isn't required with confederations or route reflectors.
Step 4: Verified References
* BGP Confederations: "Divide an AS into sub-ASes for internal segmentation" (docs.paloaltonetworks.
com/pan-os/10-2/pan-os-networking-admin/bgp/bgp-confederations).
* PAN-OS BGP: "Supports eBGP, iBGP, and confederations for routing flexibility" (paloaltonetworks.
com, PAN-OS Networking Guide).
* Use Case: "Confederations suit large internal networks" (knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com).
NEW QUESTION # 31
......
When you decide to pass the Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 exam and get relate certification, you must want to find a reliable exam tool to prepare for exam. That is the reason why I want to recommend our Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewall PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Prep Guide to you, because we believe this is what you have been looking for.
PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Latest Dumps: https://www.testpassking.com/PSE-Strata-Pro-24-exam-testking-pass.html
Choosing the right method to have your exam preparation is an important step to obtain PSE-Strata-Pro-24 exam certification, If you want to correct your mistakes when you are preparing for the PSE-Strata-Pro-24 exam, the study materials from our company will be the best choice for you, Many exam candidates attach great credence to our PSE-Strata-Pro-24 practice materials, Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Valid Test Camp With our study materials, only should you take about 20 - 30 hours to preparation can you attend the exam.
In cases where threads are already bound to processors i.e, Without using a PSE-Strata-Pro-24 lot of techno-babble, what this means is that the iPad Air can process data much faster, and this improvement in processing speed is very noticeable.
Choosing the right method to have your exam preparation is an important step to obtain PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Exam Certification, If you want to correct your mistakes when you are preparing for the PSE-Strata-Pro-24 exam, the study materials from our company will be the best choice for you.
Many exam candidates attach great credence to our PSE-Strata-Pro-24 practice materials, With our study materials, only should you take about 20 - 30 hours to preparation can you attend the exam.
All the tools of TestPassKings can PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Reliable Test Cram deal with your exam related requirements in the best manner.